Water in Cyprus (2008)

 
 

Ground Water

Skip Navigation Links
Home
About us
Contact us
Privacy policy
Security
E&E Portal

Skip Navigation Links

IntroductionsExpand Introductions
SourcesExpand Sources
PurityExpand Purity
Losses & UseExpand Losses & Use
Recycling & Reuse
Legal aspects
2010 Annex

 

 

Geology 

In the opinion of Protonique experts, the use of ground water in Cyprus has become dangerously anarchic and requires the severe application of existing and new regulations. Even under the best conditions, the aquifers will require a decade or more of rainy winters to re-establish themselves with fresh water to a normal water level. In reality, it is possible that this wonderful resource will be lost for ever in some places through over-exploitation.

There are several kinds of water table and aquifer. The two mountain systems on the island feed them in different manners. The accompanying geological map is an approximation with minimal detail. The Pentadaktylos (Kyrenia) mountains are essentially permeable sedimentary rocks, largely limestones and sandstones of many types and ages, raised by seismic activity. Much of the rainfall is absorbed into the rock and can flow downhill for as far as the rock remains porous or meets a fault line which allows the water to move to another porous layer. On the southern slopes, these porous layers extend to many kilometres south of the foothills into the Mesaoria and provide water to, for example, the Lefkosia region. There are several phreatic aquifers, allowing water to be pumped up from different levels. There is practically no vadose water in this region. The water quality is generally fairly hard, as it contains dissolved calcium salts from the limestone.

In many places, sedimentary rocks are overlaid by geologically-recent alluvial deposits brought down by ancient river systems flowing from the Troodos massif. The most important one covers much of the Eastern half of the Mesaoria, north-west of Famagusta, as far as south-west of Lefkosia, but there are other ones round Morphou and Larnaka, the latter stretching along the littoral to Zygi. The Akrotiri peninsula is almost entirely alluvial. Other patches exist in many other regions. This alluvium consists essentially of clays and marl which can form an imperveous cap over the underlying rock formations.

The Troodos mountain massif is essentially older, non-porous, metamorphosed igneous (volcanic) rock. Rain water is absorbed into the structure by a honeycomb of seismic faults and other structural cracks, some of them less than a millimetre wide. Gravitation forces the water downwards, but there is no true water table or aquifer. This water is essentially vadose and is relatively soft as there is little sedimentary calcic rock, but with a variety of dissolved mineral salts depending on the rock structure through which it passes. When such vadose water is led to the surface, this forms a spring, such as is exploited for the bottling of mineral water. The pressure of hundreds of metres of water at higher altitudes ensures an almost constant perennial flow from such sources, in many cases. Most of the water flows out of the volcanic region and, through fault lines, enters into more porous rock in the Mesaoria and coastal plains, frequently below sea level and eventually into the sea. Normally, the hydrostatic pressure of the fresh water prevents it becoming contaminated by sea water, as the flow is towards the sea. This passage through porous rock, sandstone or limestone, is phreatic in nature.

In the plains, much water is pumped out of the phreatic aquifers from boreholes and wells and this is done to such an extent that some aquifers are being totally dried out and the water tables are dropping in practically all regions. In the Troodos massif region and in the foothills, such as towards Stavrovouni, the ground water supply is less reliable as a well or borehole would need to penetrate a water-carrying crack or fault to fill. This would depend to some extent on chance but a hydrological survey could plot the major water-carrying fissures. Some areas have virtually no ground water down to the limit of normal borehole-drilling capacity, whereas a seemingly unlimited supply may sometimes be found just a few tens of metres away. Some villages (e.g. Pyrga) in this region have very adequate water supplies from boreholes, where neighbouring ones (e.g. Mosfiloti) have practically none. A borehole has recently been drilled just above Mosfiloti, but it is not yet being exploited (July 2008). Worse, as the water tables drop in coastal regions, the hydrostatic pressure falls and sea water is infiltrating into aquifers which are exploited, especially for agriculture. This is especially serious in the south-eastern part of the island in the triangle circumscribed by Cape Greco, Dhekelia and Famagusta, where well water is becoming brackish. An aquifer contaminated by sea water could remain unusable for decades, even if it is restored to full freshwater flow after adequate rainfall. This is partially because of the time lag between rain falling in the mountains and reaching the lower levels and partially because flushing the salt out from contaminated aquifers is a process of continuously successive dilutions. Other regions, including the market gardens around Maroni, with important tomato and cucumber production, are beginning to experience similar problems.

Conservation

With little doubt, it is the conservation of ground water that requires to be addressed the most urgently. New regulations must be implemented based on hydrological surveys, forbidding aggregate water to be pumped out of aquifers at a faster rate than water is arriving. This will be an expensive operation and may even close down some supplies of water. It is without any doubt that this is essential if the future economy of the island is to survive, particularly in the agricultural and related sectors.

The first thing that must be realised by everyone is that water pumped up from under the ground is not an unlimited free gift from heaven. Every drop wasted in one place may be depriving other users downstream of what they need for economical survival. The implication here is that every well and borehole in the country must be catalogued along with the water source that is being exploited by it, derived from a precise hydrological survey. However, it is not sufficient for the quantity of water extracted to be reduced to what is arriving, the depleted aquifers must be allowed to regenerate themselves. This can be done by pumping out only, say, half of the water that arrives. Even so, it would probably take at least a decade of normally wet winters before all the aquifers would be restored to a more-or-less normal situation.

It is recommended that existing subsidies on borehole drilling be stopped with immediate effect and possibly replaced by a taxation on new drillings.

A precise and complete hydrological survey will have the advantage that currently unexploited sources may be discovered. These may be from aquifers underlying existing ones but separated from them by a cap of impervious rock. It is possible that large quantities of new water at depths of between 500 and 1,000 metres may be found.

The implication of the foregoing is that owners and users of wells and boreholes would need to be severely rationed as to the quantity of water they would be permitted to extract, derived from the data established by the hydrological survey and their probable requirements. Metering of each source would therefore need to become a legal obligation. We suggest that extraction beyond the annual limit laid down would best be discouraged by the payment of charges on a sliding scale, at an increasingly swingeing rate according to the extra extracted volume. It is clear that this kind of measure would not be popular, but Protonique experts are unanimous that it is only by stringent measures that the situation can be resolved in the medium term.

The extractable ration under such a regime could be adjusted annually, according to the rainfall. On a more controversial note, there is the question to be resolved as to whether certain classes of users require a priority supply which would be detrimental to other classes. For example, it may be felt that private individuals who use well water for their gardens should obtain proportionally less than agricultural exploitations. This would be logical, but there would be two disadvantages:

  • the psychological impact of restricting water to the extent that their gardens would suffer unduly would not be favourable to the implementation of such plans;
  • a minority of individuals would be inclined to use municipal potable water for their gardens to make up the shortfall.
   
Menu errors corrected 21 September 2009  
  This site is copyright  Brian Ellis, Cyprus, 1995-2008, all rights reserved.
  All information on this and associated sites is given in good faith and no responsibility is taken for its use.