Cyprus Environment and Energy (2011)
 

Nuclear energy

Generating electricity from nuclear energy suffers from disadvantages:

However, there also great advantages:

The choice

Taking the long term view, I believe that the most economical, environmentally sensitive and reliable choice is with a small nuclear power station. A capacity of 1 to 1.6 GW would cover the foreseeable needs of Cyprus for at least two decades and provide a degree of independence from politically unstable regions. The recycling of the fuel could be kept within the European Union (France) with easy means of transport. The actual cost of nuclear-generated electricity was typically towards the top of the same range as fossil-fuel-fired systems, so should not entail any great adjustment of prices, even before the fossil fuel prices increased. Today, it is more than competitive.  In fact, as the cost of oil and gas increases even further, so nuclear energy will become comparatively cheaper. The holistic carbon dioxide emissions, including mining, purification and transport of the fuel is typically about 2 - 3 per cent of that from even the best fossil fuels:

Of course, this should be complemented by renewable sources, to a maximum possible. This maximum of variable methods is generally about 18 - 20 percent of the grid capacity, to ensure stability. At all times, the electricity from these sources should be used to a maximum and the shortfall be filled in, initially, by nuclear, then gas-fired, if the demand still exceeds the supply and, finally, oil-fired, only in an emergency. It should be remembered that Cyprus, unlike the rest of Europe, cannot supply a shortfall by importing electricity from other countries.

In my opinion, this kind of scenario provides the best possibility for Cyprus' future.

If the hydrogen-fuelled car becomes the norm, then a further 2 GW of generating capacity will be required (see the essays on Cars and Hydrogen).